Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

V2 #15

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jan 24, 2022
Merged

V2 #15

merged 18 commits into from
Jan 24, 2022

Conversation

cshreyastech
Copy link
Collaborator

Created RBDL unit test cases for KUKA, parallel bar and ECM.

@cshreyastech
Returning Rbdl model as pointer to accomodate test framework
dafcd05
@cshreyastech
Kuka FK working
874e816
@cshreyastech
Added Unit test case to validate RBDL VS AMBF Forward Kinematics results
c5badc4
@cshreyastech
Created ECM model with Hardcoded values. Yet to be evaluated.
47392ee
@cshreyastech
Changed Util class to static in rbdl_model_tests
e4da927
@cshreyastech
Working on ECM model
0d22266
@cshreyastech
Build Hard Coded RBDL ECM model. Yet to be FK tested
3367928
@cshreyastech
Adding Test Cases for Parallel Structure
dfa6dd4
@cshreyastech
Working FK test for Parallel Joints
f9a6c6b
@cshreyastech
Parallel Joints Passing FK for Home pose
7e4e350
@cshreyastech
Changed to Quaternion from ryp for finding Base transformation in par…
26073b2 
…allel joints
@cshreyastech
Passing RBDL test cases for parallel joint(with no constraint defined…
2bfe216 
…) set to pi/4
@cshreyastech
Passing FK test case for Parallel Joints with random poses
1933729
@cshreyastech
Passing FK test cases for ECM Hardcoded model
14059c1
@cshreyastech
Working on ECM FK random pose
f5511a7
@cshreyastech
Added RBDL Test cases for KUKA Rotaion validation
9d4e7fe
@cshreyastech
Updating before changing test cases for parallel joints
5f61587
@cshreyastech
Restructed Test case for Parallel Joints Open Loop
2a7976d
@cshreyastech cshreyastech merged commit 0b9910a into WPI-AIM:v2 Jan 24, 2022
@nag92 nag92 linked an issue Jun 16, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
discuses how to decouple the parser from AMBF #26
Open
@nag92 nag92 removed a link to an issue Jun 16, 2022
discuses how to decouple the parser from AMBF #26
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@cshreyastech